Current:Home > StocksSupreme Court declines to take up appeal from John Eastman involving emails sought by House Jan. 6 select committee -NextFrontier Finance
Supreme Court declines to take up appeal from John Eastman involving emails sought by House Jan. 6 select committee
View
Date:2025-04-16 14:45:11
Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from conservative attorney John Eastman that involved his efforts to shield his emails from investigators with the House select committee probing the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.
Notable in the unsigned order turning away Eastman's case was a note that Justice Clarence Thomas "took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition." The justice did not provide an explanation for his recusal. Eastman clerked for Thomas on the Supreme Court, and emails obtained by the House panel showed that Ginni Thomas, the justice's wife, corresponded with the conservative lawyer.
Eastman, a former law professor at Chapman University, helped craft the legal strategy in which he claimed former Vice President Mike Pence had the authority to unilaterally reject state electoral votes cast for Joe Biden or delay the certification of Electoral College votes during the joint session of Congress on Jan. 6.
In August, Eastman, former President Donald Trump and 17 others were charged in a sprawling racketeering case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Eastman faces nine counts related to an alleged plan to send a slate of fake presidential electors in Georgia to Congress in order to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. He pleaded not guilty.
The case before the Supreme Court stemmed from an effort by Eastman to keep his emails from the House select committee examining the Capitol attack. Eastman argued the subpoena for his records sought attorney-client privileged communications and attorney work product.
A federal district court ordered Eastman to turn over a tranche of emails to the panel, 10 of which the judge said were "closely tied" to the committee's investigation and subject to the crime-fraud exception, which applies to documents and communications that were in furtherance of illegal or fraudulent conduct.
U.S. District Judge David Carter had previously determined that Trump and Eastman "likely committed obstruction of an official proceeding" when they allegedly attempted to disrupt the joint session of Congress convened on Jan. 6.
Eastman sought review of the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, but provided the select committee with eight of the disputed documents in order to comply with the district court's order. After the emails were disclosed to the public, the 9th Circuit dismissed the case as moot and declined to wipe away the district court's finding that some of the messages were subject to the crime-fraud exception..
In urging the Supreme Court to take up his case, Eastman said the district court's conclusion"has cast aspersions not just on Dr. Eastman but also on his former client, the former President of the United States who is a candidate for the office of President in 2024."
"The ramifications, both political and legal, of such a holding are significant, and petitioner, both on his own behalf and for his former client's benefit, should not have to be subjected to those ramifications on an ongoing basis when he was deprived of his right to appeal by the unilateral actions of the government — the party that prevailed in the District Court — that mooted the appeal," he wrote in a filing.
- In:
- Clarence Thomas
veryGood! (361)
Related
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Chiefs WR Marquise Brown ‘will miss some time’ after dislocating a clavicle in 26-13 loss at Jaguars
- Browns’ plans for move to new dome stadium hits snag as county backs city’s renovation proposal
- Man sentenced to jail after involuntary manslaughter plea in death stemming from snoring dispute
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Jupiter and Mars are about meet up: How to see the planetary conjunction
- Elle King says dad Rob Schneider sent her to 'fat camp,' forgot birthday
- Robert Tucker, the head of a security firm, is named fire commissioner of New York City
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Summer tourists flock to boardwalks and piers while sticking to their budgets
Ranking
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- UNC women's soccer coach Anson Dorrance, who won 21 NCAA titles, retires
- Blink Fitness, an affordable gym operator owned by Equinox, files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
- Emotions run wild as players, celebrities bask in US women's basketball gold medal
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Man sentenced to jail after involuntary manslaughter plea in death stemming from snoring dispute
- A'ja Wilson had NSFW answer to describe Kahleah Copper's performance in gold medal game
- Who won at the box office this weekend? The Reynolds-Lively household
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Maryland house leveled after apparent blast, no ongoing threat to public
Billie Eilish Welcomes the Olympics to Los Angeles With Show-Stopping Beachfront Performance
Incarcerated fathers and daughters reunite at a daddy-daughter dance in Netflix documentary
Could your smelly farts help science?
Sonya Massey's death: How race, police and mental health collided in America's heartland
Jason Biggs knows 'attractive pie' hosting Netflix's 'Blue Ribbon Baking' show
Who won at the box office this weekend? The Reynolds-Lively household